S. Allan, The Shape of the Turtle, Myth, Art and Cosmos in Early China, 1991.

P. K. Benedict, Sino-Tibetan: a Conspectus, 1972.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511753541

R. Blust, Sibilant Assimilation in Formosan Languages and the Proto-Austronesian Word for 'Nine': A Discourse on Method, Oceanic Linguistics, vol.34, issue.2, pp.443-453, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/3623051

F. Bottero, Sémantisme et classification dans l'écriture chinoise, Paris: Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises, 1996.

C. D. Buck, A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal European languages, 1949.

K. C. Chang, The Archaeology of Ancient China, 1977.

. Gong and . Hwang-cherng, A comparative study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese vowel systems Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, pp.51-455, 1980.

B. Karlgren, Grammata Serica (Script and phonetics in Chinese and

J. Matisoff, Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman, 2003.

L. Sagart, Nord et Sud dans la langue des Shang, Pao LXXIV, pp.249-54, 1988.

U. Unger, Die Armbrust und der steigende Ton, p.36, 1990.

W. Allan, G. Boltz, J. Jacques, and . Shaoyu, Alain Peyraube and Axel Schuessler for useful comments. Errors, of course

. Burmese and . Sino, Tibetan language, has received strong influence from Indic culture. It is therefore not surprising that Burmese uses its words for 'front': hre', and 'back': nok, to refer to the east and west respectively

. H. William and . Baxter, ) notes the graphic and phonetic similarity to ? 'bundle', Old Chinese * b s-tok, 2004.