Are Fast Court Proceedings Good or Bad?: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Autre publication scientifique Année : 2009

Are Fast Court Proceedings Good or Bad?: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data

Résumé

We analyze the effect of the degree of judicial enforcement on the probability of credit constraints, the amount of loan and the probability of default. Contrary to the traditional view on judicial efficiency of credit market, our estimation results show that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of being rationed and decreases credit granted by banks, consistent with laziness effects. In order to confirm the laziness effect more directly, we analyzed the effect of the degree of judicial enforcement on the probability of default and found that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of default, as expected.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
0916.pdf ( 662.59 Ko ) Télécharger
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-00407674, version 1 (27-07-2009)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-00407674 , version 1

Citer

Charles Yuji Horioka, Shizuka Sekita. Are Fast Court Proceedings Good or Bad?: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data. 2009. ⟨halshs-00407674⟩
82 Consultations
124 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 06/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus