ln (1+Li(1-Bij)Di PORT ) -0, pp.32-32 ,
ln (1+Lj(1-Bij)Dj PORT ) 0, pp.64-64 ,
Trade Costs, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.XLII, pp.691-751, 2004. ,
Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.1, pp.170-192, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1257/000282803321455214
Central Asia: increasing gains from trade through regional cooperation in trade policy, transport and customs transit, 2006. ,
Russia's accession to the WTO: the potential for trade increase, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol.32, issue.4, pp.680-699, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jce.2004.08.005
On the Endogeneity of International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreements, American Economic Association annual meeting, 2002. ,
Towards an Integrated Europe, 1994. ,
Is Regionalism Simply a Diversion? Evidence from the Evolution of the EC and EFTA " In Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements, 1997. ,
The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.71, issue.1, pp.143-53, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1928061
Institution Building and the Integration of Eastern Europe in International Production Center for New and Emerging Markets Discussion Paper No, 2001. ,
Infrastructure, transport costs and trade, Journal of International Economics, vol.47, issue.1, pp.169-189, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00008-7
Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model, The World Bank Economic Review, vol.19, issue.1, pp.99-120, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1093/wber/lhi004
The Elimination of Madagascar's Vanilla Marketing Board, Ten Years On, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1596/1813-9450-3979
How Costly is it for Poor Farmers to Lift Themselves Out of Poverty? CEPR discussion paper 5392, 2005. ,
Towards development in landlocked countries. Cepal Serie macroeconomia del desarrollo No. 29, 2004. ,
Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model, European Economic Review, vol.50, issue.2, pp.223-247, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001
Determinants of Bilateral Trade : Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?, The Regionalization of the World Economy, 1998. ,
Trade Flows in the Former Soviet Union, 1987 to 1996, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol.30, issue.1, pp.76-90, 1987. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jcec.2001.1752
The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects, Empirical Economics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.571-580, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s001810200146
A Research Database on Infrastructure Economic Performance, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3643, 2005. ,
On Theories explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation, NBER Working Paper No. National Bureau of Economic Research, vol.6529, 1998. ,
The Challenges Facing Landlocked Developing Countries, Journal of Human Development, vol.14, issue.1, pp.31-68, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14649880310001660201
Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, 2004. ,
Disintegration and Trade, Review of International Economics, vol.267, issue.5, pp.811-829, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1162/003465300559046
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.199.2982
Dynamic Monotonicity and Comparative Statics for Real Options, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.75, issue.1, pp.104-121, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeth.1997.2284
The importance of good neighbors: regional trade in Central Asia Lessons not learned: natural resource rent and social welfare in the CCA Countries, 2005. ,
Opening up International Trade with Eastern Europe, Economic Policy, vol.7, issue.14, pp.77-116, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1344513
Specification Tests in Econometrics, Econometrica, vol.46, issue.6, pp.1251-1271, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1913827
Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects, Econometrica, vol.49, issue.6, pp.1377-1398, 1981. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1911406
URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/64044/1/paneldataunobser00haus.pdf
Opening Up and Geographic Diversification of Trade in Transition Economies, IMF Working Paper 98, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.5089/9781451921267.001
How Much Do National Borders Matter?, 1998. ,
Export Performance in Transition Economies, Economic Policy, vol.11, issue.23, pp.423-442, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1344709
Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade, The World Bank Economic Review, vol.15, issue.3, pp.451-479, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1093/wber/15.3.451
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.22.5096
Review of inter-regional trade and transport facilitation in Europe and Central Asia region, South Asia region East Asia and Pacific region, 2005. ,
Trade policies in Central Asia after EU enlargement and before Russian WTO accession: Regionalism and integration into the world economy, Economic Systems, vol.29, issue.1, pp.32-58, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecosys.2005.01.002
Determinants of the Negative Impact of Being Landlocked on Trade: An Empirical Investigation Through the Central Asian Case, Comparative Economic Studies, vol.16, issue.3, pp.520-536, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.11130/jei.2001.16.3.379
Central Asia's transport cost burden and its impact on trade, Economic Systems, vol.29, issue.1, pp.6-31, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecosys.2005.02.004
Shipping costs, manufactured exports, and Economic Growth, 1999. ,
Infrastructure development in landlocked and transit developing countries: Foreign aid private investment and the transport cost burden of landlocked developing countries, 2001. ,
How Has Regionalism in the 1990s Affected Trade?, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol.12, pp.1-29, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1596/1813-9450-2156
Armenia; Australia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Bahamas; Bahrain; Bangladesh; Barbados; Belarus; Belgium; Belize; Benin; Bhutan; Bolivia; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Botswana; Brazil; Bulgaria; Burkina Faso; Burundi; Cambodia; Cameroon; Canada; Cape Verde; Central African Republic; Chad; Chile; China; Colombia; Comoros, Congo Rep ,
Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; Djibouti; Dominica; Dominican Republic; Ecuador; Egypt Arab Rep.; El Salvador; Eritrea; Estonia; Ethiopia; Fiji; Finland; France; Gabon; Gambia; Georgia; Germany; Ghana ,
Guinea-Bissau; Guyana; Haiti; Honduras; Hong-Kong; Hungary; Iceland; India; Indonesia; Iran Islamic Rep.; Ireland; Israel; Italy; Jamaica; Japan; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kenya Latvia; Lebanon; Lesotho; Liberia; Libya; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macao; Macedonia, Korea Rep.; Kuwait; Kyrgyz Republic; Lao PDR ,
Mauritania; Mauritius; Mexico; Micronesia Fed. Sts.; Moldova; Mongolia; Morocco; Mozambique; Namibia; Nepal; Netherlands; New Zealand; Nicaragua; Niger; Nigeria; Norway; Oman; Pakistan; Panama; Papua New Guinea; Paraguay; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian Federation; Rwanda ,
Slovak Republic; Slovenia; Solomon Islands; South Africa; Spain; Sri Lanka; Sudan; Suriname; Swaziland; Sweden; Switzerland; Syrian Arab Republic; Tajikistan; Tanzania; Thailand; Togo; Tonga; Trinidad and Tobago; Tunisia; Turkey; Turkmenistan; Uganda; Ukraine; United Arab Emirates; United Kingdom; United States; Uruguay; Uzbekistan; Samoa; St. Kitts and Nevis; St. Lucia; St. Vincent and the Grenadines; Vanuatu; Venezuela; Vietnam; Yemen Rep.; Zambia ,
PORT : Distance measured in kilometres between the main city in country i (mostly the capital city) and access to the nearest port. The data come from Faye et al. (2005) and the authors' calculations. This variable is adjusted by Li(j)(1-Bi(j)), i.e. it is set to 0 for costal countries and for trade between neighbouring countries ,
Dummy equal to one if i (j) is a Central Asian country ,