T. Aidt, Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy, Journal of Public Economics, vol.69, issue.1, pp.1-16, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00006-1

D. P. Baron and J. A. Ferejohn, Bargaining in Legislatures, The American Political Science Review, vol.83, issue.4, pp.1181-1206, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/1961664

D. Borger, B. Dunkerley, F. , and P. S. , Strategic investment and pricing decisions in a congested transport corridor, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.62, issue.2, pp.294-316, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jue.2007.01.001

D. Borger, B. Dunkerley, F. , and P. S. , The Interaction between Tolls and Capacity Investment in Serial and Parallel Transport Networks, Review of Network Economics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.136-158, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.001

D. Borger, B. Proost, S. , V. Dender, and K. , Congestion and tax competition in a parallel network, European Economic Review, vol.49, issue.8, pp.2013-2040, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.005

D. Borger, B. Proost, and S. , A political economy model of road pricing, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.71, issue.1, pp.79-92, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jue.2011.08.002

E. Lyon, Enquête ménages déplacements 2006, de l'aire métropolitaine lyonnaise, 2006.

B. S. Frej, Why are efficient transport policy instruments so seldom used?, 2003.

M. Gaunt, T. Rye, and S. Allen, Public Acceptability of Road User Charging: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum, Transport Reviews, vol.45, issue.1, pp.85-102, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008044199-3/50007-4

B. Hårsman and J. M. Quigley, Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing: Ideology and self-interest, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol.43, issue.4, pp.854-874, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00003-8

S. Ison and T. Rye, Implementing Road User Charging: The Lessons Learnt from Hong Kong, Cambridge and Central London, Transport Reviews, vol.31, issue.4, pp.451-465, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01098637

S. Jaensirisak, Acceptability of Road User Charging, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008044199-3/50013-X

D. Levinson, Why States Toll: An Empirical Model of Finance Choice, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol.35, issue.2, pp.223-237, 2001.

I. Mayeres and S. Proost, Marginal tax reform, externalities and income distribution, Journal of Public Economics, vol.79, issue.2, pp.343-363, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00100-0

URL : http://www.econ.kuleuven.ac.be/ew/admin/Publications/DPS98/DPS9832.pdf

R. Mcquaid and M. Grieco, Edinburgh and the politics of congestion charging: Negotiating road user charging with affected publics, Transport Policy, vol.12, issue.5, pp.475-476, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.06.005

T. Rye, M. Gaunt, and S. Ison, Edinburgh's Congestion Charging Plans: An Analysis of Reasons for Non-Implementation, Transportation Planning and Technology, vol.31, issue.6, pp.31-641, 2008.
DOI : 10.1080/0144164042000335788

J. Schade and . Schlag, Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, 2003.

B. Schaller, New York City???s congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States, Transport Policy, vol.17, issue.4, pp.266-273, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.013

K. Small and J. Yan, The Value of ???Value Pricing??? of Roads: Second-Best Pricing and Product Differentiation, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.49, issue.2, pp.310-336, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/juec.2000.2195

L. Steg, Factors influencing the acceptability and effectiveness of transport pricing Acceptability of transport pricing strategies, Ch, vol.12, 2003.

C. Raux and S. Souche, The Acceptability of Urban Road Pricing, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, vol.38, issue.2, pp.191-216, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00067812

E. Verhoef, P. Nijkamp, and P. Rietveld, Second-Best Congestion Pricing: The Case of an Untolled Alternative, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.40, issue.3, pp.279-302, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/juec.1996.0033

J. Westin, J. P. Franklin, S. Grahn?voorneveld, and S. Proost, How to decide on regional infrastructure to achieve intra-regional acceptability and inter-regional consensus?*, Papers in Regional Science, vol.31, issue.3, pp.91-617, 2012.
DOI : 10.1006/juec.1996.0033