The body does not lie': Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime, media, vol.2, pp.143-158, 2006. ,
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, 1995. ,
Handbook of Genetics and Society. Mapping the New Genomic Era, 2009. ,
Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance, 1973. ,
Disentrenching experiment. The construction of GM-Crop field trials as a social problem, Technology & Human Values, vol.33, issue.2, pp.201-229, 2008.,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02666738
Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences, 2000. ,
A second locus mapping to 2q35-36 for familial pseudohyperkalaemia, European Journal of Human Genetics, vol.12, pp.1073-1076, 2004. ,
La gestion des risques: de l'anti-psychiatrie à l'après-psychanalyse, 1981. ,
The social and legal construction of suspects, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol.2, pp.39-60, 2006. ,
Biosecurity: Towards an anthropology of the contemporary, Anthropology Today, vol.20, issue.5, pp.5-7, 2004. ,
Public understandings of the forensic use of DNA: Positivity, misunderstandings and cultural concerns, Technology & Society, vol.34, issue.1-2, pp.21-32, 2014. ,
DNA Tests and databases in criminal justice: Individual rights and the common good, pp.197-223, 2004. ,
The subject and power, Michel Foucault: Between Structuralism and Hermeneutics, pp.208-226, 1982. ,
, Dits et écrits II, 1976.
1994]b) Dits et écrits I, 1954-1975, 2001. ,
DNA technology application procedures in forensic practice: Social and ethical conditioning II, International Congress Series, vol.1261, pp.571-573, 2004. ,
The Discovery of Grounded Theory, 1967. ,
Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol.26, pp.266-271, 2000. ,
Seminar « Façonner les gens, 2005. ,
Biological citizenship reconsidered, Technology & Human Values, vol.39, issue.4, pp.488-510, 2014. ,
Biosurveillance and biocivic concerns, from 'truth' to 'trust': the Australian forensic DNA terrain, Genetic Suspects. Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, pp.262-287, 2010. ,
, Genetic Suspects. Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, 2010.
Novel association analysis between 9 short tandem repeat loci polymorphisms and coronary heart disease based on a cross-validation design, Atherosclerosis, vol.218, pp.151-155, 2011. ,
DNA and the Criminal Justice System. The Technology of Justice, pp.337-355, 2004. ,
Categorization: Identity, social process and epistemology, Current Sociology, vol.48, issue.3, pp.7-25, 2000. ,
Biosocialité : genèse, enjeux et postérité d'un concept, Politix, vol.2, issue.90, pp.21-46, 2010. ,
The sociology of entrenchment: A cystic fibrosis test for everyone?, Social Science & Medicine, vol.39, issue.9, pp.1211-1220, 1994. ,
DNA and the Criminal Justice System. The Technology of Justice, pp.357-390, 2004. ,
Le contrôle social après Foucault, Surveillance & Society, vol.1, issue.3, pp.431-475, 2003. ,
Informed consent in forensic DNA databases: Volunteering, constructions of risk and identity categorization, BioSocieties, vol.4, pp.335-348, 2009. ,
Would you accept having your DNA profile inserted in the national forensic DNA database? Why?, Forensic Science International, vol.8, pp.132-136, 2014. ,
Voluntary participation in forensic DNA databases: Altruism, resistance, and stigma, Technology & Human Values, vol.41, issue.2, pp.322-343, 2016. ,
Le profilage des populations, Du livret ouvrier au cybercontrôle, 2014.,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01805505
, Surveillance Studies, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition, pp.733-741, 2015.
Genetic exceptionalism and future diaries: Is genetic information different from other medical information, Genetic Secrets. Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality, pp.60-73, 1997. ,
PopAffiliator: Online calculator for individual affiliation to a major population group based on 17 autosomal short tandem repeat genotype profile, International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol.125, pp.629-636, 2011. ,
Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl, 2002. ,
Situated dis/empowerment in transnational DNA profile exchange, British Journal of Criminology, vol.50, issue.6, pp.1117-1135, 2010. ,
Essays on the Anthropology of Reason, 1996. ,
, Rapport d'information sur les fichiers mis à la disposition des forces de sécurité, p.17, 2018.
, , 1992.
Les préoccupations sécuritaires : une mutation ? Revue française de sociologie, vol.45, pp.211-241, 2004. ,
The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the Twentyfirst Century, 2007. ,
Identity Politics and the New Genetics, 2012. ,
Forensic DNA and the politics of racialized data, Identity Politics After DNA: Re/creating Categories of Difference and Belonging, pp.53-78, 2011. ,
Attitudes regarding the national forensic DNA database: Survey data from the general public, prison inmates and prosecutors'offices in the Republic of Serbia, Forensic Science International, vol.28, pp.44-51, 2017. ,
Health and wealth, law and order: banking DNA against disease and crime, Genetic Suspects. Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, pp.85-104, 2010. ,
The Birth of a Genetics Policy. Social Issues of Newborn Screening, 2013.,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01445394
, The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society, vol.2, pp.661-665, 2014.
The politics of suspects' geo-genetic origin in France: The conditions, expression, and effects of problematisation, BioSocieties, vol.12, issue.1, pp.66-88, 2016.,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01666332
Les fichiers d'empreintes génétiques et les analyses d'ADN en droit pénal sous le regard du droit et de la sociologie, 2016. ,
, Cahiers Droits, Sciences & Technologies, vol.6, pp.43-53
De la vie biologique à la vie sociale, Approches sociologiques et anthropologiques. Paris: La Découverte, 2011.,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00661456
Durabilité et extension du soupçon. Catégorisations et usages policiers du fichier d'empreintes génétiques en France. Revue française de sociologie, vol.59, pp.707-733, 2018. ,
Finding the balance: forensic DNA profiling in New Zealand, Genetic Suspects. Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, pp.288-308, 2010. ,
Genetics and the Unsettled Past: The Collision of DNA, Race, and History, 2012. ,
Wonderment and dread': Representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic databases, New Genetics & Society, vol.23, issue.2, pp.205-223, 2004. ,
Inclusiveness, effectiveness, and intrusiveness: Issues in the developing uses of DNA profiling in support of criminal Investigations, Journal Law Med. Ethics, vol.33, issue.3, pp.545-558, 2005. ,
Public perspectives on established and emerging forensic genetics technologies in Europe, 2014. ,
Identity, mass fatality and forensic genetics, New Genetics and Society, vol.33, issue.3, pp.257-276, 2014. ,
Social and ethical aspects of forensic genetics: A critical review, Forensic Science Review, vol.29, p.145, 2017. ,
Public voices on forensic DNA technologies and the National DNA Database, New Genetics and Society, vol.31, issue.3, pp.285-298, 2012. ,
, As for the French fingerprint database, the Fichier automatisé des empreintes digitales (FAED), in October 2018 it included 6.2 million registered individuals and 220,000 traces (cf. Rapport d'information sur les fichiers mis à la disposition des forces de sécurité, i The Traitement d'Antécédents Judiciaires or Judicial History Application (TAJ) is the widest and most commonly used database, 2017.
, iii The law describes 'serious or corresponding evidence' making it 'probable' that the individuals have committed an offence covered under the scope of the FNAEG
Questions to the Government no, p.19, 2010. ,
, from the Ministry of Justice CRIM-PJ no. 08-28.H5. According to this circular, 'regarding minors over the age of 13, the advisability of taking a sample must be carefully assessed, following consultation between the judicial police and the prosecution service.' vi Personal communication from the forensic science department of the police services. vii Rapport d'information sur les fichiers mis à la disposition des forces de sécurité, Response of 8, 2008.
, As the name suggests, they are short sequences of repeated DNA that experts distinguish by size. xii The practices and discourses of police officers and gendarmes have been analysed in another study, 2018.
, regarding internal security made the refusal to give a DNA sample an offence that carries a maximum penalty of 15,000 euros and a 1 year prison sentence for suspected individuals, to be doubled in the case of convicted individuals. xiv Circulars of 27, 2000.
, xvii This lawyer uses the term 'whistleblowers' for opponents who alert public opinion to what they consider to be a danger or a problem (police use of databases, advertising, GM crops
, xviii While emphasising that this argument was seldom used during our interviews, it should be noted that the larger the database, the more likely comparison errors (false positive matches) between a trace and a suspect are to occur
, to describe people exposed to radiation from Chernobyl, Rose (2007) talks about a 'biological citizenship' encompassing projects that are led by citizens and linked to their biological existence as human beings. Due to the dimension of choice and responsibility of actors expressed by this concept, xix Borrowing the term used by Petryna, 2002.
, and Marper v The United Kingdom case, the court held that the blanket and indiscriminate retention of DNA profiles and the samples of suspected individuals-as was the case in the UK until the ECHR's judgment-was, in the context of state intrusion into the private life of an individual, in contradiction with the need for proportionality between an offence committed and the request for a DNA sample (we recall that the DNA samples of identified individuals, in France, are not retained). Case of S. and Marper v. The United Kingdom, 2008.
Automatisé des Empreintes Digitales or FAED) in a way which could be transposed to the FNAEG, and this conviction rested on the concept of proportionality and private life in exactly the same terms as those of the Marper judgment. Case of M.K. v France. Judgment of 18, Several organisations, including the SM, the LDH and the SAF, also questioned the Ministry of Justice in this regard in 2013. xxi National DNA database strategy, 2010. ,
, Fichage génétique: la France toujours dans l'illégalité, xxv Statistics provided by the Ministry of Justice, 2003.
, Although judges apply the law strictly, the rather symbolic nature of some penalties (100 euros) indicates that they may not be entirely at ease with these borderline cases, particularly where the original charge has been dropped but the charge against the DNA refusal pursued, xxvi Incidentally, while there is a high proportion of convictions for refusing to give a sample, sentences are generally light
the numbers of markers studied has been fixed at 21 as per the Decree, vol.10, 2015. ,
xxx Through a study of the United Kingdom's genetic database, Skinner (2011) reveals a policy centred on the construction and use of racial data, demonstrating the recurrent discussion of the validity and legitimacy of the use of so-called ethnic or racial categories ,
, xxxi For a study of the sensitivity of this topic and its legal context in France, in regard to other practices involving the police and legal system, see, 2017.
, Jugement de la Cour d'Appel d'Amiens du 13 juin 2014, Arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 10 juin 2015. xxxiii See the judgment Arrêt de la Cour de cassation du 10 juin 2015. xxxiv 'Ils ont refusé de donner leur ADN, The Oversight Committee and the Interministerial Committee responsible for the FNAEG, 2007.