On the Distinction between Argumental and non-argumental Anaphors - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 1984

On the Distinction between Argumental and non-argumental Anaphors

Pierre Pica

Résumé

We claim that the Binding Theory has to be modified in order to account for the fact that certain anaphors ate subject to a condition equivalent to the Specified Subject Condition while others are not and that anaphors in argument positions and anaphors in non argument positions arerespectively subject to two different locality conditions.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Pica_Onthe_Distinction_BetweenArgumental_nonArgumentall.pdf (406.04 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Accord explicite pour ce dépôt

Dates et versions

halshs-00357652 , version 1 (31-01-2009)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-00357652 , version 1

Citer

Pierre Pica. On the Distinction between Argumental and non-argumental Anaphors. W. de Gesst & Y. Putseys. Sentential Complementation, Foris, pp.185-193, 1984, Linguistic Models. ⟨halshs-00357652⟩
133 Consultations
101 Téléchargements

Partager

More