Book Sections Year : 1984

On the Distinction between Argumental and non-argumental Anaphors

Pierre Pica

Abstract

We claim that the Binding Theory has to be modified in order to account for the fact that certain anaphors ate subject to a condition equivalent to the Specified Subject Condition while others are not and that anaphors in argument positions and anaphors in non argument positions arerespectively subject to two different locality conditions.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Pica_Onthe_Distinction_BetweenArgumental_nonArgumentall.pdf (406.04 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Explicit agreement for this submission

Dates and versions

halshs-00357652 , version 1 (31-01-2009)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-00357652 , version 1

Cite

Pierre Pica. On the Distinction between Argumental and non-argumental Anaphors. W. de Gesst & Y. Putseys. Sentential Complementation, Foris, pp.185-193, 1984, Linguistic Models. ⟨halshs-00357652⟩
133 View
105 Download

Share

More