Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue European Economic Review Année : 2015

Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game

Résumé

We investigate the impact of various audit schemes on the provision of public goods, when contributing less than the average of the other group members is centrally sanctioned and the probability of an audit is unknown. We study how individuals update their beliefs about the probability of being audited, both before and after audits are permanently withdrawn. We find that when individuals have initially experienced systematic audits, they decrease both their beliefs and their contributions almost immediately after audits are withdrawn. In contrast, when audits were initially less frequent and more irregular, they maintain high beliefs and continue cooperating long after audits have been withdrawn. This identifies the compliance effect of irregularity and uncertainty due to learning difficulties. By increasing both the frequency of audits and the severity of sanctions, we also identify an educative effect of frequent and high sanctions on further cooperation
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-01089700, version 1 (02-12-2014)

Identifiants

Citer

Zhixin Dai, Robin M. Hogarth, Marie Claire Villeval. Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game. European Economic Review, 2015, 74, pp.146-162. ⟨10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.11.009⟩. ⟨halshs-01089700⟩
117 Consultations
0 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 20/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus