The never-ending debate about The moral basis of a backward society: Banfield and ‘amoral familism’ - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Anthropological Society of Oxford Year : 2009

The never-ending debate about The moral basis of a backward society: Banfield and ‘amoral familism’

Abstract

This article analyses Edward Banfield's book, The moral basis of a backward society. According to this American scholar, prioritizing present orientation over future planning is the distinctive character of backwardness. For this reason, in understanding backward rural contexts, cultural factors are far more important than socioeconomic factors. His research is extensively discussed in the first section of the article. Then, in the second part, the main criticisms in both international and Italian debates over the book are presented in order to contextualize the reasons for the strong scholarly interest generated by the theory of amoral familism.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
1-THE_NEVER-ENDING_DEBATE_ABOUT_THE_MORAL.pdf (142.42 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Loading...

Dates and versions

halshs-01314030 , version 1 (10-05-2016)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-01314030 , version 1

Cite

Emanuele Ferragina. The never-ending debate about The moral basis of a backward society: Banfield and ‘amoral familism’. Journal of Anthropological Society of Oxford, 2009, 1 (2), pp.141-160. ⟨halshs-01314030⟩
696 View
3691 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More