Safety Leadership in Complex Environments: achieving theory - method consistency through a Critical Realist approach
Résumé
Abstract: Research on leadership has evolved from static leader-centric toward more
processual and context-based models. Complex environments reinforce the need of this
evolution and result in the emergence of a new conceptualization: the complexity leadership
that considers leadership as a dynamic, contingent and interactive process. Studying complexity
leadership requires new methods allowing to better understand the role of leaders in handling
non-linear, dynamic and interactive phenomena. Traditional epistemological paradigms failed
to capture the underlying mechanisms of complex dynamics. Critical Realism offers an
interesting epistemological framework to achieve theory-method consistency for understanding
leadership as a process in complex environments. Based on a specific example of complexity
leadership – safety leadership, this paper proposes an integrated multi-level conceptual
framework that allows to reconceptualize the role of leadership as a process in complex
environments.