Gerontocracy in a comparative perspective - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Sociology Compass Année : 2021

Gerontocracy in a comparative perspective

Résumé

Gerontocracy, in its narrowest sense, refers to political systems ruled by elderly people, whether de jure or de facto. Although formal gerontocratic rules are progressively disappearing, contemporary political systems are still governed by individuals who are significantly older than the mean voter. This article reviews existing explanations for the prevalence of gerontocracy. To summarize main findings, gerontocracy cannot be explained by the leadership qualities of older rulers: aging leaders do not perform better in office and voters seem to be aware of it. Instead, existing research suggests that gerontocracy can be explained by strategic considerations. In autocracies, the selectorate tends to choose aging leaders in order to reduce their expected tenure length. In democracies, voters are more likely to select experienced candidates, which they expect to be more effective at advancing the interests of their constituency: this premium put on experience mechanically lengthens political careers and increases the age of the average politician. Finally, older voters, which participate more in politics, tend to prefer older politicians, because they (correctly) expect them to better defend their own interests.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-02997208 , version 1 (10-11-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Raul Magni Berton, Sophie Panel. Gerontocracy in a comparative perspective: Explaining why political leaders are (almost always) older than their constituents. Sociology Compass, 2021, 15 (1), ⟨10.1111/soc4.12841⟩. ⟨halshs-02997208⟩
72 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More