Representation vs derivation: The case for a modular view of phonology - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue Radical: A journal of Phonology Année : 2020

Representation vs derivation: The case for a modular view of phonology

Résumé

Plurilinear representations and constraint-based derivation have been the main tools used in the last 40 years by autosegmental approaches and OT respectively. It is argued here that the border be-tween representation and derivation depends on another key division in phonological theory: in phonology proper, there are no such things as processes involving feature propagation or delinking; only by virtue of morphophonological alternations, that is of phonology/morphosyntax interaction, may an object be said to changeinto another one. Thus, representational theories better describe core phonology, seen as an au-tonomous module of grammar, while constraint-based models are nec-essary to deal with computation associated with phonology's upper interfaces.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Carvalho-2021.pdf ( 493.61 Ko ) Télécharger
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-03154028, version 1 (26-02-2021)
halshs-03154028, version 2 (23-02-2022)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-03154028 , version 2

Citer

Joaquim Brandão De Carvalho. Representation vs derivation: The case for a modular view of phonology. Radical: A journal of Phonology, 2020, 1, pp.292-327. ⟨halshs-03154028v2⟩
67 Consultations
163 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 26/06/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus