Ecosystems as Quasi-essential Facilities: Should We Impose Platform Neutrality? - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue Journal of Law, Market & Innovation Année : 2022

Ecosystems as Quasi-essential Facilities: Should We Impose Platform Neutrality?

Résumé

The Google Shopping judgment raises the question of the possibility of attributing some of the characteristics of essential facilities to specific digital infrastructures and services. Such characteristics could lead to imposing access and neutrality obligations on digital ‘gatekeepers’ for the benefit of business partners, which may compete with some of their activities. This contribution examines the legitimacy and effectiveness of such injunctions. The aim is to examine successively the necessary scope of such obligations by questioning the place of the criterion of the indispensability of access, to consider the limits of such kind of asymmetrical regulation of competition, and to consider the possibility of addressing them through structural remedies
Loading...
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-03880314, version 1 (01-12-2022)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-03880314 , version 1

Citer

Frédéric Marty, Jeanne Mouton. Ecosystems as Quasi-essential Facilities: Should We Impose Platform Neutrality?. Journal of Law, Market & Innovation, 2022, 1 (3), pp.108-134. ⟨halshs-03880314⟩
22 Consultations
0 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 07/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus