Ubiquitous Privacy Protection
Ciaran Bryce
(1)
,
M.A.C Dekker
(2)
,
Sandro Etalle
(2)
,
Daniel Le Métayer
(3)
,
Frédéric Le Mouël
(4)
,
Marine Minier
(4)
,
Joël J. Moret-Bailly
(5)
,
Stéphane Ubéda
(4)
Daniel Le Métayer
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 170349
- IdHAL : daniel-le-metayer
- IdRef : 083763961
Frédéric Le Mouël
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 79
- IdHAL : frederic-le-mouel
- ORCID : 0000-0002-7323-4057
- IdRef : 075648938
Marine Minier
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1084364
- IdHAL : marine-minier
- ORCID : 0000-0003-3252-2578
Joël J. Moret-Bailly
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 756632
- IdRef : 086137972
Stéphane Ubéda
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 471
- IdHAL : stephane-ubeda
- IdRef : 034430555
Résumé
The main message of this position paper is that ubiquitous computing technology need not necessarily be an obstacle to privacy protection: if legal and social issues are given proper consideration, technology can also be used to allow individuals to exercise their rights. We believe that the key issue is to devise techniques able to support ambitious privacy protection policies while allowing for the flexibility required in the ambient intelligence context. We illustrate our position using three technical requirements: (1) formal specification of privacy policies, (2) trust management and (3) auditability, which show both the challenges posed by ubiquitous computing and the opportunities to strengthen privacy. For each of these requirements, we present the legal and social motivations, suggest technical challenges and provide hints on possible solutions based on our on-going work.
Format du dépôt | Fichier |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Communication dans un congrès |
Titre |
en
Ubiquitous Privacy Protection
|
Résumé |
en
The main message of this position paper is that ubiquitous computing technology need not necessarily be an obstacle to privacy protection: if legal and social issues are given proper consideration, technology can also be used to allow individuals to exercise their rights. We believe that the key issue is to devise techniques able to support ambitious privacy protection policies while allowing for the flexibility required in the ambient intelligence context. We illustrate our position using three technical requirements: (1) formal specification of privacy policies, (2) trust management and (3) auditability, which show both the challenges posed by ubiquitous computing and the opportunities to strengthen privacy. For each of these requirements, we present the legal and social motivations, suggest technical challenges and provide hints on possible solutions based on our on-going work.
|
Auteur(s) |
Ciaran Bryce
1
, M.A.C Dekker
2
, Sandro Etalle
2
, Daniel Le Métayer
3
, Frédéric Le Mouël
4
, Marine Minier
4
, Joël J. Moret-Bailly
5
, Stéphane Ubéda
4
1
ACES -
Ambient computing and embedded systems
( 2505 )
- Campus de Beaulieu 35042 Rennes cedex
- France
2
DIES -
Distributed and Embedded Security
( 95967 )
- University of Twente Faculty of EEMCS P.O.-Box 217 7500 AE Enschede The Netherlands
- Pays-Bas
3
POP ART -
Programming languages, Operating Systems, Parallelism, and Aspects for Real-Time
( 44976 )
- Inria Grenoble - Rhône-Alpes 655 avenue de l'Europe - Montbonnot 38334 Saint Ismier Cedex
- France
4
ARES -
Architectures of networks of services
( 2372 )
- CITI Laboratory Domaine Scientifique de la Doua,
INSA Lyon
Bâtiment Leonard de Vinci
21, avenue Jean Capelle
69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
- France
5
CERCRID -
Centre de Recherches Critiques sur le Droit
( 3131 )
- 35 rue du 11 novembre 42023 Saint-Étienne cedex 2
- France
|
Actes |
Oui
|
Date de publication |
2007
|
Titre du congrès |
Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Ubicomp Privacy in conjunction with the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'2007)
|
Date début congrès |
2007-09
|
Ville |
Innsbruck
|
Pays |
Autriche
|
Commentaire |
Position Paper.
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Invité |
Non
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Domaine(s) |
|
Mots-clés |
en
trust management, audit, a posteriori verification, privacy policy model, formal specification, user consent
|
Origine :
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...