Enterprise Modelling for the Masses – From Elitist Discipline to Common Practice
Robert Winter
(1)
,
Kurt Sandkuhl
(2)
,
Hans-Georg Fill
(3)
,
Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
(4)
,
John Krogstie
(5)
,
Andreas Leue
(6)
,
Florian Matthes
(7)
,
Andreas L. Opdahl
(8)
,
Gerhard Schwabe
(9)
,
Ömer Uludag
(7)
1
HSG -
University of St.Gallen
2 University of Rostock
3 University of Vienna [Vienna]
4 HAN University of Applied Sciences [Netherlands]
5 NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim]
6 Sphenon GmbH
7 TUM - Technische Universität Munchen - Technical University Munich - Université Technique de Munich
8 UiB - University of Bergen
9 UZH - Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich
2 University of Rostock
3 University of Vienna [Vienna]
4 HAN University of Applied Sciences [Netherlands]
5 NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim]
6 Sphenon GmbH
7 TUM - Technische Universität Munchen - Technical University Munich - Université Technique de Munich
8 UiB - University of Bergen
9 UZH - Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich
Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1024255
John Krogstie
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1024264
Florian Matthes
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1024244
Andreas L. Opdahl
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 862023
- ORCID : 0000-0002-3141-1385
- IdRef : 171409817
Gerhard Schwabe
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 995656
Ömer Uludag
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1024266
Résumé
Enterprise modelling (EM) as a discipline has been around for several decades with a huge body of knowledge on EM in academic literature. The benefits of modelling and its contributions to organizational tasks are largely undisputed. Thus, from an inside-out perspective, EM appears to be a mature and established discipline. However, for initiating serious innovations this view is not sufficient. This position paper takes an outside-in perspective on enterprise modelling and argues that EM is far away from reaching its maximum potential. EM is typically done by a limited number of people in organizations inclined to methods and modelling. What is captured in models is only a fragment of what ought to be captured. Many people actually develop some kind of model in their local practice without thinking about it consciously. Exploiting the potential of this “grass roots modelling” could lead to groundbreaking innovations in EM. The aim is to investigate integration of the established, often systematic and formalized practices of modelling in enterprises with local practices of creating, using and communicating model-like artifacts or objects of relevance for the overall organization.
Format du dépôt | Fichier |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Communication dans un congrès |
Titre |
en
Enterprise Modelling for the Masses – From Elitist Discipline to Common Practice
|
Résumé |
en
Enterprise modelling (EM) as a discipline has been around for several decades with a huge body of knowledge on EM in academic literature. The benefits of modelling and its contributions to organizational tasks are largely undisputed. Thus, from an inside-out perspective, EM appears to be a mature and established discipline. However, for initiating serious innovations this view is not sufficient. This position paper takes an outside-in perspective on enterprise modelling and argues that EM is far away from reaching its maximum potential. EM is typically done by a limited number of people in organizations inclined to methods and modelling. What is captured in models is only a fragment of what ought to be captured. Many people actually develop some kind of model in their local practice without thinking about it consciously. Exploiting the potential of this “grass roots modelling” could lead to groundbreaking innovations in EM. The aim is to investigate integration of the established, often systematic and formalized practices of modelling in enterprises with local practices of creating, using and communicating model-like artifacts or objects of relevance for the overall organization.
|
Auteur(s) |
Robert Winter
1
, Kurt Sandkuhl
2
, Hans-Georg Fill
3
, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
4
, John Krogstie
5
, Andreas Leue
6
, Florian Matthes
7
, Andreas L. Opdahl
8
, Gerhard Schwabe
9
, Ömer Uludag
7
1
HSG -
University of St.Gallen
( 480976 )
- Suisse
2
University of Rostock
( 82150 )
- Albert-Einstein-Straße 22 18059 Rostock Germany
- Allemagne
3
University of Vienna [Vienna]
( 107975 )
- Universitätsring 1, 1010 Wien
- Autriche
4
HAN University of Applied Sciences [Netherlands]
( 348023 )
- Pays-Bas
5
NTNU -
Norwegian University of Science and Technology [Trondheim]
( 50794 )
- NO-7491 Trondheim
- Norvège
6
Sphenon GmbH
( 523026 )
- Allemagne
7
TUM -
Technische Universität Munchen - Technical University Munich - Université Technique de Munich
( 132871 )
- Arcisstrasse 21, D- 80333 München
- Allemagne
8
UiB -
University of Bergen
( 300728 )
- Universitetet i Bergen | Postboks 7800, NO-5020 Bergen
- Norvège
9
UZH -
Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich
( 146992 )
- Rämistrasse 71 CH-8006 Zürich
- Suisse
|
Licence |
Paternité
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Source |
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Invité |
Non
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Actes |
Oui
|
Date de publication |
2016
|
Titre de la collection |
The Practice of Enterprise Modeling
|
Volume |
LNBIP-267
|
Page/Identifiant |
225-240
|
Titre du congrès |
9th IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM)
|
Date début congrès |
2016-11-08
|
Date fin congrès |
2016-11-10
|
Ville |
Skövde
|
Pays |
Suède
|
Commentaire |
Part 2: Regular Papers
|
Domaine(s) |
|
Éditeur commercial |
|
Éditeur scientifique |
|
Collaboration/Projet |
|
Mots-clés |
en
Enterprise modelling, Grass roots modelling, Research roadmap
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-48393-1_16 |
Origine :
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...