Does loving every mean loving every every, even non-existent ones ? - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2012

Does loving every mean loving every every, even non-existent ones ?

Laurent Cesalli
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 932454

Résumé

The study introduces the problematic of quantification and universals in 13th century logic and in sophismatic literature in particular. In an extended appendix, the sophisma "Omnis phoenix est" from the anonymous Opus puerorum is edited (Ms. Amiens, Bibliothèque municipale 406, f. 138ra-139ra).

Domaines

Philosophie
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-00750110 , version 1 (09-11-2012)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-00750110 , version 1

Citer

Laurent Cesalli. Does loving every mean loving every every, even non-existent ones ?: Universals and distribution in the Opus puerorum. J. L. Fink, H. Hansen, and M. Mora-Márquez. Logic and Language in the Middle Ages. A Volume in Honour of Sten Ebbesen, Leiden : Brill, p. 305-336, Brill, pp.305-336, 2012. ⟨halshs-00750110⟩
88 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More