Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue Synthese Année : 2014

Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results

Résumé

A part of the scientific literature consists of intermediate results within a longer project. Scientists often publish a first result in the course of their work, while aware that they should soon achieve a more advanced result from this preliminary result. Should they follow the proverb "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush", and publish any intermediate result they get? This is the normative question addressed in this paper. My aim is to clarify, to refine, and to assess informal arguments about the choice whether to publish intermediate results. To this end, I adopt a rational decision framework, supposing some utility or preferences, and I propose a formal model. The best publishing strategy turns out to depend on the research situation. In some simple circumstances, even selfish and short-minded scientists should publish their intermediate results, and should thus behave like their altruistic peers, i. e. like society would like them to behave. In other research situations, with inhomogeneous reward or difficulty profiles, the best strategy is opposite. These results suggest qualified philosophical morals.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
T8_v6_model_author-version-with-warning.pdf ( 278.31 Ko ) Télécharger
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-01053681, version 1 (05-08-2014)

Identifiants

Citer

Thomas Boyer. Is a bird in the hand worth two in the bush? Or, whether scientists should publish intermediate results. Synthese, 2014, 191 (1), pp.17-35. ⟨10.1007/s11229-012-0242-4⟩. ⟨halshs-01053681⟩
237 Consultations
213 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 12/05/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus