"Scientific Collaboration: Do Two Heads Need to Be More Than Twice Better Than One?" - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue Philosophy of Science Année : 2015

"Scientific Collaboration: Do Two Heads Need to Be More Than Twice Better Than One?"

Résumé

Epistemic accounts of scientific collaboration usually assume that, one way or another, two heads really are more than twice better than one. We show that this hypothesis is unduly strong.We present a deliberately crudemodel with unfavorable hypotheses.We show that, even then, when the priority rule is applied, large differences in successfulness can emerge from small differences in efficiency, with sometimes increasing marginal returns. We emphasize that success is sensitive to the structure of competing communities. Our results suggest that purely epistemic explanations of the efficiency of collaborations are less plausible but have much more powerful socioepistemic versions.

Domaines

Philosophie
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-01230736, version 1 (18-11-2015)

Identifiants

Citer

Cyrille Imbert, Thomas Boyer-Kassem. "Scientific Collaboration: Do Two Heads Need to Be More Than Twice Better Than One?". Philosophy of Science, 2015, 82 (4), pp.667-688. ⟨10.1086/682940⟩. ⟨halshs-01230736⟩
100 Consultations
0 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 05/05/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus