Voice and Culture: A Prospect Theory Approach
E.Laine Paddock,
(1)
,
Jaewon Ko
(2)
,
Russell Cropanzano,
(3)
,
Jessica Bagger,
(4)
,
Assâad El Akremi
(5)
,
Julie Camerman,
(6)
,
Gary. J Greguras
(1)
,
Antonio Mladinic
(7)
,
Kidok Nam,
(2)
,
Kjell Tornblom
(8)
,
Kees van den Bos
(9)
,
Carolina Moliner
(10)
1
Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore
2 Department of Psychology, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, Korea
3 Leeds School of Business [Boulder]
4 GU - Göteborgs Universitet = University of Gothenburg
5 CRM - Centre de Recherche en Management
6 Research and Development, Training Institute of the Federal Administration, Brussels, Belgium
7 Department of Psychology, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
8 USYSTdLab - Transdisciplinarity Lab [ETH Zürich]
9 Universiteit Utrecht / Utrecht University [Utrecht]
10 UV - Universitat de València
2 Department of Psychology, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, Korea
3 Leeds School of Business [Boulder]
4 GU - Göteborgs Universitet = University of Gothenburg
5 CRM - Centre de Recherche en Management
6 Research and Development, Training Institute of the Federal Administration, Brussels, Belgium
7 Department of Psychology, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
8 USYSTdLab - Transdisciplinarity Lab [ETH Zürich]
9 Universiteit Utrecht / Utrecht University [Utrecht]
10 UV - Universitat de València
Résumé
The present study examines the congruence of individuals’ minimum preferred amounts of voice with the prospect theory value function
across nine countries. Accounting for previously ignored minimum preferred amounts of voice and actual voice amounts integral to testing
the steepness of gain and loss functions explicated in prospect theory, we use curve fitting to show that ratings of procedural justice fit prospect
theory’s value function specifically. Further, we investigate the form of this function across nine countries that range in power distance. Results
suggest that the form of the value function is congruent with prospect theory, showing an S-shaped curve that is steeper in the loss than in the
gain domain. Further, this pattern is similar across countries. Theoretical and practical implications of these results for both decision making
and organizational justice are discussed.
Domaines
Gestion et managementFormat du dépôt | Notice |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Article dans une revue |
Titre |
en
Voice and Culture: A Prospect Theory Approach
|
Résumé |
en
The present study examines the congruence of individuals’ minimum preferred amounts of voice with the prospect theory value function
across nine countries. Accounting for previously ignored minimum preferred amounts of voice and actual voice amounts integral to testing
the steepness of gain and loss functions explicated in prospect theory, we use curve fitting to show that ratings of procedural justice fit prospect
theory’s value function specifically. Further, we investigate the form of this function across nine countries that range in power distance. Results
suggest that the form of the value function is congruent with prospect theory, showing an S-shaped curve that is steeper in the loss than in the
gain domain. Further, this pattern is similar across countries. Theoretical and practical implications of these results for both decision making
and organizational justice are discussed.
|
Auteur(s) |
E.Laine Paddock,
1
, Jaewon Ko
2
, Russell Cropanzano,
3
, Jessica Bagger,
4
, Assâad El Akremi
5
, Julie Camerman,
6
, Gary. J Greguras
1
, Antonio Mladinic
7
, Kidok Nam,
2
, Kjell Tornblom
8
, Kees van den Bos
9
, Carolina Moliner
10
1
Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore
( 447066 )
- Singapour
2
Department of Psychology, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, Korea
( 447068 )
- Corée du Sud
3
Leeds School of Business [Boulder]
( 447070 )
- 419 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0419
- États-Unis
4
GU -
Göteborgs Universitet = University of Gothenburg
( 302859 )
- Box 100, SE-405 30 Göteborg
- Suède
5
CRM -
Centre de Recherche en Management
( 179623 )
- 2 rue du Doyen Gabriel Marty 31042 Toulouse Cedex
- France
6
Research and Development, Training Institute of the Federal Administration, Brussels, Belgium
( 447072 )
- Training Institute of the Federal Administration, Brussels, Belgium
- Belgique
7
Department of Psychology, Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
( 447073 )
- Chili
8
USYSTdLab -
Transdisciplinarity Lab [ETH Zürich]
( 447074 )
- Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich
- Suisse
9
Universiteit Utrecht / Utrecht University [Utrecht]
( 300572 )
- Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht
- Pays-Bas
10
UV -
Universitat de València
( 303680 )
- Av. de Blasco Ibáñez, 13, 46010 València
- Espagne
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Date de production/écriture |
2015
|
Nom de la revue |
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Date de publication |
2015
|
Date de publication électronique |
2014-09-18
|
Volume |
28
|
Numéro |
4
|
Page/Identifiant |
167-175
|
URL éditeur |
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
|
Domaine(s) |
|
Mots-clés |
en
"prospect theory", "cross-cultural", "voice expectations", "fairness"
|
DOI | 10.1002/bdm.1834 |
Loading...