Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2015

Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies

Résumé

In ten videotaped socio-scientific debates related to water,students from Mexico, the USA and France tend to focus on afew alternative positions. On the basis of Grize’s definition ofschematization, we followed their reasoning by studying howthey cast light on specific aspects of the discursive object“water”. Through textometrical analysis of debate transcripts,we specified 6 characteristics of “water” that are more or lessemphasized depending on the prevailing nationalargumentative scenario.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
ECA15RP_PoloPlantinLundNiccolai_PARTAGEABLE.pdf (907.93 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

halshs-01335866 , version 1 (05-01-2017)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01335866 , version 1

Citer

Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund, Gerald P. Niccolai. Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies. 1st European Conference on Argumentation Argumentation and Reasoned Action, 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. pp.821-838. ⟨halshs-01335866⟩
102 Consultations
83 Téléchargements

Partager

More