The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2014

The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition

Résumé

In this talk, we briefly compare and contrast two research traditions: the hypothetico-deductive and the ethnomethodological. We will present three case studies from our own research that mostly exemplify the hypothetico-deductive tradition.We will illustrate with these case studies three different dangers of theorizing before analysis and how we saved ourselves from these dangers.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-01392574 , version 1 (04-11-2016)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01392574 , version 1

Citer

Kristine Lund, Matthieu Quignard. The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition. Empirical Approaches to Argumentation, Marianne Doury, Jul 2014, Paris, France. ⟨halshs-01392574⟩
54 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More