Dependency Annotation Choices : Assessing Theoretical and Practical Issues of Universal Dependencies - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication dans un congrès Année : 2016

Dependency Annotation Choices : Assessing Theoretical and Practical Issues of Universal Dependencies

Résumé

This article attempts to place dependency annotation options on a solid theoretical and applied footing. By verifying the validity of some basic choices of the current dependency reference framework, Universal Dependencies (UD), in a perspective of general annotation principles, we show how some choices can lead to inconsistencies and discontinuities, partly due to UD's alternation between syntax and semantics. For some constructions, we propose better suited alternative structures with a clear-cut distinction of syntax and semantics. We propose a classification of conception oriented , annotator-oriented, and finally , treebank end-user-oriented considerations to be used in the creation of new annotation schemes.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
dependencychoices-law2016.pdf ( 574.32 Ko ) Télécharger
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-01509118, version 1 (19-09-2019)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01509118 , version 1

Citer

Kim Gerdes, Sylvain Kahane. Dependency Annotation Choices : Assessing Theoretical and Practical Issues of Universal Dependencies. LAW X (2016) The 10th Linguistic Annotation Workshop : 131, 2016, Berlin, Germany. ⟨halshs-01509118⟩
158 Consultations
221 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 27/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus