Risk target : an interactive context factor in risk perception
Danièle Hermand
(1)
,
Serge Karsenty
(2)
,
Yves Py
(3)
,
Laurent Guillet
(3, 4, 5)
,
Bruno Chauvin
(3)
,
Arnaud Simeone
(6)
,
Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre
(7)
,
Etienne Mullet
(8)
1
Université Lille Nord de France (COMUE)
2 CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
3 UN - Université de Nantes
4 Lab-STICC - Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance
5 Lab-STICC_FHOOX - Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems
6 GRePS - Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale
7 UT - Université de Toulouse
8 CLLE-LTC - Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie
2 CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
3 UN - Université de Nantes
4 Lab-STICC - Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance
5 Lab-STICC_FHOOX - Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems
6 GRePS - Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale
7 UT - Université de Toulouse
8 CLLE-LTC - Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie
Arnaud Simeone
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 172963
- IdHAL : arnaud-simeone
- ORCID : 0000-0001-8070-3651
- IdRef : 179942042
Etienne Mullet
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 14771
- IdHAL : etienne-mullet
- ORCID : 0000-0002-1707-3914
- IdRef : 033294399
Résumé
The effect of specification of the target on risk evaluation was examined. A whole set of hazards, covering most of the domains, were considered: common individual hazards, outdoor activities, medical care, public transportation, energy production, pollutants, sex, deviance, and addictions. Three human targets were introduced: personal health risk (including personal risk of death), health risk for people in the country, and health risk for people in the world.The basic design was a between-subjects design. The first hypothesis was that risk judgments made in the “world” condition should be higher than risk judgments made in the “country” condition, and risk judgments made in this condition should be higher than risk judgments made in the “personal” condition. This is what was observed. The second hypothesis was that the target effect should differ as a function of the kind of hazards considered. This also is what was observed. In two domains— pollutants, and deviance, sex, and addictions—the target effect was important. It corresponded to about one-tenth of the response scale. In the four remaining domains, the target effect was unimportant or absent.
Format du dépôt | Fichier |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Article dans une revue |
Résumé |
en
The effect of specification of the target on risk evaluation was examined. A whole set of hazards, covering most of the domains, were considered: common individual hazards, outdoor activities, medical care, public transportation, energy production, pollutants, sex, deviance, and addictions. Three human targets were introduced: personal health risk (including personal risk of death), health risk for people in the country, and health risk for people in the world.The basic design was a between-subjects design. The first hypothesis was that risk judgments made in the “world” condition should be higher than risk judgments made in the “country” condition, and risk judgments made in this condition should be higher than risk judgments made in the “personal” condition. This is what was observed. The second hypothesis was that the target effect should differ as a function of the kind of hazards considered. This also is what was observed. In two domains— pollutants, and deviance, sex, and addictions—the target effect was important. It corresponded to about one-tenth of the response scale. In the four remaining domains, the target effect was unimportant or absent.
|
Titre |
en
Risk target : an interactive context factor in risk perception
|
Auteur(s) |
Danièle Hermand
1
, Serge Karsenty
2
, Yves Py
3
, Laurent Guillet
3, 4, 5
, Bruno Chauvin
3
, Arnaud Simeone
6
, Maria Teresa Munoz Sastre
7
, Etienne Mullet
8
1
Université Lille Nord de France (COMUE)
( 164505 )
- COMUE Communauté d'universités et établissements Lille-Nord-de-France -
- 365 bis, rue Jules Guesde BP 50458 - 59658 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex
- (A succédé au PRES Université de Lille Nord de France)
- France
2
CNRS -
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
( 441569 )
- France
3
UN -
Université de Nantes
( 93263 )
- 1, quai de Tourville - BP 13522 - 44035 Nantes cedex 1
- France
4
Lab-STICC -
Laboratoire des sciences et techniques de l'information, de la communication et de la connaissance
( 486345 )
- Technopole Brest Iroise CS 83818 29238 BREST cedex 3
- France
5
Lab-STICC_FHOOX -
Equipe Human and Organizational Factors and autOmatic in compleX systems
( 1067641 )
- France
6
GRePS -
Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale
( 49955 )
- Université Lyon 2 - Institut de Psychologie 5 avenue Pierre Mendès-France - 69676 BRON cedex
- France
7
UT -
Université de Toulouse
( 443875 )
- 41 Allée Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse
- France
8
CLLE-LTC -
Cognition, Langues, Langage, Ergonomie
( 161396 )
- Maison de La Recherche 5, Allées Antonio Machado 31058 TOULOUSE CEDEX 9
- France
|
Page/Identifiant |
821-828
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Numéro |
4
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Nom de la revue |
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Date de publication |
2003
|
Volume |
23
|
Domaine(s) |
|
Mots-clés |
en
Sex, Target, Addictions, Pollutants, Risk perception
|
Origine :
Accord explicite pour ce dépôt
Loading...