Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Journal articles

Scientific Uncertainty in the Press: How Newspapers Describe Initial Biomedical Findings

Abstract : Newspapers preferentially cover initial biomedical findings although they are often disconfirmed by subsequent studies. We analyzed 426 newspaper articles covering 40 initial biomedical studies associating a risk factor with 12 pathologies and published between 1988 and 2009. Most articles presented the study as initial but only 21% mentioned that it must be confirmed by replication. Headlines of articles with a replication statement were hyped less often than those without. Replication statements have tended to disappear after 2000, whereas hyped headlines have become more frequent. Thus, the public is increasingly poorly informed about the uncertainty inherent in initial biomedical findings.
Complete list of metadata

https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01807150
Contributor : Karine Jenart Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, June 4, 2018 - 2:40:28 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, June 25, 2022 - 10:38:30 AM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Estelle Dumas-Mallet, Andy Smith, Thomas Boraud, François Gonon. Scientific Uncertainty in the Press: How Newspapers Describe Initial Biomedical Findings. Science Communication, 2018, 40 (1), pp.124-141. ⟨10.1177/1075547017752166⟩. ⟨halshs-01807150⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

74