Words to Reason and Argue about Drinking Water Management: Comparing Debates from Mexican, US and French Schools. - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2016

Words to Reason and Argue about Drinking Water Management: Comparing Debates from Mexican, US and French Schools.

Résumé

In ten videotaped socio-scientific debates related to water, students from Mexico, the USA and France tend to focus on few alternative positions. On the basis of Grize's definition of schematization, we followed their reasoning by studying how they put light on specific aspects of the discursive object 'water'. Through textometrical analysis of debate transcripts, we specified 6 characteristics of 'water' that are more or less emphasized depending on the prevailing national argumentative scenario.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
ECA15RP_PoloPlantinLundNiccolai_PARTAGEABLE.pdf (907.93 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-01871646 , version 1 (11-09-2018)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01871646 , version 1

Citer

Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund, Gerald P. Niccolai. Words to Reason and Argue about Drinking Water Management: Comparing Debates from Mexican, US and French Schools.. D. Mohammed & M. Lewínski (Coord.). Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, 2, College Publications, pp.821-838, 2016. ⟨halshs-01871646⟩
65 Consultations
61 Téléchargements

Partager

More