“Conflict-performance assumption” or “performance-conflict assumption”: Insights from franchising - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of retailing and consumer services Année : 2020

“Conflict-performance assumption” or “performance-conflict assumption”: Insights from franchising

Résumé

Franchising is an organizational governance form where relational and formal contracts complement each other and where franchisor and franchisees together may obtain better performance than working alone. Although relational contracts may adapt to changing environments, they are not as efficient in ambiguous settings. In franchised stores, liability for low performance is not always clear. Indeed, franchisor and franchisees work in close collaboration, and, therefore, this ambiguity on causes of low performance may lead to conflicts. The franchising literature, as far as we know, has addressed practitioners' concerns regarding performance on one side, and conflicts on the other side, but no study has exclusively focused on low performance and the emergence of conflicts. Our research contributes to the franchising literature by filling this relative gap and, contrary to “conflict-performance assumption” (Pearson, 1973; Duarte and Davies, 2003) held in the broader context of distribution channels, we consider low performance to be a cause, rather than a consequence, of franchisor/franchisee conflicts. This empirical study deals with franchising in France, the leading market in franchising in Europe and the third largest in the world. We used a qualitative approach based on 44 in-depth interviews with 27 franchisors and executives/high-level managers of franchise chains, as well as 17 franchisees from various industries to get a dual, and so more complete, assessment of franchising practitioners' views of performance-related conflicts. Our research findings show that franchisees, as independent small business owners, give priority to financial results compared to other goals and they are driven to continuously improve the performance of their store(s). When expectations are not met, franchisees sometimes blame franchisors because they are interdependent in their success and liability is not straightforward. As a collaborative team, franchisors and franchisees may benefit from minimizing conflicts and preventing them with the careful selection and management of franchisees that share franchisor's values and have internal locus of control.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Perrigot et al-2020-“Conflict-performance assumption” or “performance-conflict assumption”.pdf (858.84 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-02512843 , version 1 (07-05-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Rozenn Perrigot, Begona López-Fernández, Guy Basset. “Conflict-performance assumption” or “performance-conflict assumption”: Insights from franchising. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2020, 55, ⟨10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102081⟩. ⟨halshs-02512843⟩
109 Consultations
209 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More