Explicit apprehensions, implicit instructions - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société
Chapitre D'ouvrage Année : 2021

Explicit apprehensions, implicit instructions

Résumé

Among the languages that grammaticalize the apprehensive domain, some use a subordinator like Eng. lest (“Don’t run, lest you fall”); others have an apprehensive modality within their verb system. Mwotlap (Oceanic, Vanuatu) thus has a mood marker /tiple/ (≈‘might’), often found in paratactic constructions like “Don’t run, you might fall!” This apprehensive also encodes a form of interclausal dependency; yet rather than being due to syntactic subordination proper, this dependency effect is arguably of a pragmatic nature. Indeed, by exposing an event (e.g. your falling) as a risk to be avoided, the apprehensive clause serves as an argument towards a certain behaviour (“don’t run”). Sometimes, only the apprehension is formulated (“You might fall!”), leading the hearer to reconstruct the intended instruction. The apprehensive mood then defines an indirect speech act – one where exposing a danger serves as a proxy for an implicit order. The pragmatic effect is sometimes exploited for politeness strategies, or for its humorous potential.

Domaines

Linguistique
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-03092513 , version 1 (02-01-2021)

Licence

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-03092513 , version 1

Citer

Alexandre François. Explicit apprehensions, implicit instructions. Marine Vuillermet; Eva Schultze-Berndt. A typology of apprehensives, Language Science Press, inPress, Studies in Diversity Linguistics. ⟨halshs-03092513⟩
62 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Partager

More