Do organisms have an ontological status? - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Année : 2010

Do organisms have an ontological status?

Résumé

The category "organism" has an ambiguous status: is it scientific or is it philosophical? Or, if one looks at it from within the relatively recent field or sub-field of philosophy of biology, is it a central, or at least legitimate category therein, or should it be dispensed with? In any case, it has long served as a kind of scientific bolstering for a philosophical train of argument which seeks to refute the mechanistic or reductionist trend, which has been perceived as dominant since the 17th century, whether in the case of Stahlian animism, Leibnizian monadology, the neo-vitalism of Hans Driesch, or, lastly, of the "phenomenology of organic life" in the 20th century, with authors such as Kurt Goldstein, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Georges Canguilhem. In this paper I try to reconstruct some of the main interpretive stages or layers of the concept of organism in order to evaluate it critically. How might organism be a useful concept if one rules out the excesses of organismic biology and metaphysics? Varieties of instrumentalism and what I call the projective concept of organism are appealing, but perhaps ultimately unsatisfying.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
CW-Organism HPLS 2010.pdf ( 329.56 Ko ) Télécharger
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-04242911, version 1 (15-10-2023)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-04242911 , version 1
  • PUBMED : 21162368

Citer

Charles T. Wolfe. Do organisms have an ontological status?. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 2010, 32 (2-3), pp.195-231. ⟨halshs-04242911⟩
17 Consultations
12 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 07/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus