The Social Constitution of Mathematical Knowledge. Objectivity, Semantics, and Axiomatics - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre d'ouvrage Année : 2023

The Social Constitution of Mathematical Knowledge. Objectivity, Semantics, and Axiomatics

Résumé

The philosophy of mathematical practice sometimes investigates the social constitution of mathematics but does not always make explicit the philosophical-normative framework that guides the discussion. This chapter investigates some recent proposals in the philosophy of mathematical practice that compare social facts and mathematical objects, discussing similarities and differences. An attempt will be made to identify, through a comparison with three different perspectives in social ontology, the kind of objectivity attributed to mathematical knowledge, the type of representational or non-representational semantics adopted, and the justificatory or coordinative role entrusted to axiomatics. After a brief introduction to key issues in social ontology, Section 3 of the paper offers a survey of contributions by Feferman, Ferreirós, and Cole, highlighting a difference between approaches based on rules, practices, and intentional states, respectively. Section 4.1 also discusses results by Carter, Collin, Giardino, and Pantsar, focusing on differences between the objectivity of knowledge and objectivity of objects and showing that many authors combine a realist, structuralist, and pragmatist perspective, as well as the idea that objectivity comes in degrees. Section 4.2 focuses on the kind of semantics that is adopted in socially oriented approaches. A representational semantics is preferred by authors grounding their views on mental states, whereas a non-representational semantics best fits with views based on practices. Section 5 considers how axiomatics can be understood in a social perspective. Axiomatics generally plays a justificatory role also in theories that aim to explain the social constitution of mathematical knowledge. Yet, if one shifts from approaches based on mental states to approaches anchored on rules or habits, axiomatics can be viewed as an institution based on obligations, functions, coordination problems, and agent’s actions and roles, thus playing an organizational and coordination role.
Loading...
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-04385023, version 1 (10-01-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Paola Cantù. The Social Constitution of Mathematical Knowledge. Objectivity, Semantics, and Axiomatics. B. Sriraman. Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, Springer International Publishing, pp.1-31, 2023, 978-3-030-19071-2. ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_57-1⟩. ⟨halshs-04385023⟩
5 Consultations
0 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 28/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus