The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Communication dans un congrès Année : 2014

The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition

Résumé

In this talk, we briefly compare and contrast two research traditions: the hypothetico-deductive and the ethnomethodological. We will present three case studies from our own research that mostly exemplify the hypothetico-deductive tradition.We will illustrate with these case studies three different dangers of theorizing before analysis and how we saved ourselves from these dangers.
Loading...
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-01392574, version 1 (04-11-2016)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01392574 , version 1

Citer

Kristine Lund, Matthieu Quignard. The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition. Empirical Approaches to Argumentation, Marianne Doury, Jul 2014, Paris, France. ⟨halshs-01392574⟩
51 Consultations
0 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 31/03/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus