Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre d'ouvrage Année : 2016

Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme


Nicolas Steno’s criticism of "L’Homme" played a major role in the early reception of Cartesianism: from the late 1660s, the "Discourse on the Anatomy of the Brain" has never ceased being used in order to discredit Descartes’s philosophy. And yet, the anatomical works of Nicolas Steno are themselves informed by Cartesian method. This paradox has led to the depiction of Steno either as a repentant Cartesian or a non-Cartesian mechanist. In this paper, I clarify such problematic labels by studying the different kinds of relationships between anthropology and anatomy that L’Homme may have used to justify. In particular, I show how Descartes’ clock analogy was used to defend two different conceptions of the articulation between anatomical observations and functional hypotheses. The confusion between those two conceptions explain the contradictory claims about the place of anatomy in Descartes’ natural philosophy.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2016_Andrault_DescartesTreatiseonMan_ClockAnalogy.pdf ( 315.63 Ko ) Télécharger
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

halshs-01531880, version 1 (12-07-2020)



Raphaële Andrault. Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme. Delphine Antoine; Stephen Gaukroger. Descartes’ Treatise of Man and its reception, 43, Springer, pp.175-192, 2016, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 978-3-319-46989-8. ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-46989-8_11⟩. ⟨halshs-01531880⟩
149 Consultations
258 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 20/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits



Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus