Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Access content directly
Book Sections Year : 2016

Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme

Abstract

Nicolas Steno’s criticism of "L’Homme" played a major role in the early reception of Cartesianism: from the late 1660s, the "Discourse on the Anatomy of the Brain" has never ceased being used in order to discredit Descartes’s philosophy. And yet, the anatomical works of Nicolas Steno are themselves informed by Cartesian method. This paradox has led to the depiction of Steno either as a repentant Cartesian or a non-Cartesian mechanist. In this paper, I clarify such problematic labels by studying the different kinds of relationships between anthropology and anatomy that L’Homme may have used to justify. In particular, I show how Descartes’ clock analogy was used to defend two different conceptions of the articulation between anatomical observations and functional hypotheses. The confusion between those two conceptions explain the contradictory claims about the place of anatomy in Descartes’ natural philosophy.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2016_Andrault_DescartesTreatiseonMan_ClockAnalogy.pdf (315.64 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

halshs-01531880 , version 1 (12-07-2020)

Identifiers

Cite

Raphaële Andrault. Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme. Delphine Antoine; Stephen Gaukroger. Descartes’ Treatise of Man and its reception, 43, Springer, pp.175-192, 2016, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 978-3-319-46989-8. ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-46989-8_11⟩. ⟨halshs-01531880⟩
146 View
247 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More